PUNCHES AND WHIPS
This is one of those situations where you do not know how to digest what you are seeing. When you are about to intervene because you are witnessing an aggression but suddenly you stop like the Window's blue screen of death.
Meanwhile, far from there...
It is not a good idea to start a fight with a tray of potatoes in your hands.
Respect the elders (I)
Respect the elders (II)
Don't bust my balls before my first coffee.
ExtraBall by david
Too much trust
Crystal Rush exhibitionism | Stacey Scowley in Californication | I love Tessa Fowler
Fucking Nancy A. passionately
MINUS TIMES MINUS EQUALS MORE. IF EVERYONE IS ARMED, NO ONE IS ARMED.Weapons create paradoxes that are hard to resolve. In a country where they’re legal, those who don’t carry one put themselves at a disadvantage against those who do. But if everyone is armed, no one dares to use theirs because they know the other person might shoot first. And yet, in a country where they’re banned, the only ones who have them are those who don’t follow the law, leaving everyone else as defenseless targets.
The theory says that arming the population creates balance, a game of deterrence where the risk of retaliation keeps guns holstered. But reality is far messier. Owning a gun, in itself, can push you to use it in situations where you otherwise never would have considered it. A misunderstanding, a pointless road rage incident, a moment of anger… and suddenly, pulling the trigger feels like an option.
If no one carries weapons, there’s no dilemma. If everyone does, the risk is always there but kept in check by mutual fear. And between these two extremes, the paradox remains: allowing guns means that those who don’t carry them are at risk, banning them means only those already outside the law will have them. So the real question is: which scenario would you rather live in?
# Watch Video
Instant Karma.